Showing posts with label british colonialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label british colonialism. Show all posts

Thursday, December 03, 2015

नेपाल में चिनिया भाषा



मगर प्रदेश में  कामकाजका भाषा मगर भाषा भी हो वो राजनीतिक अधिकार की बात है। सुगमता की भी बात है। बहुत मगर लोग हैं जिन्हे अपने इलाके से बाहर कहीं जाना नहीं। तो उन्हें अपनी सरकार अपने भाषा में सहभागी होने का अधिकार है।

लेकिन नेपाल में बहुत भाषा ऐसे हैं जो बोलचाल के भाषा तो हैं लेकिन इतना विकास नहीं  हो पाया है कि लिखपढ़ हो सके। एक समय नेपाली भाषा की वही हालत थी। अरबो खरबो के लगानी के बाद नेपाली भाषा का विकास हुवा है। तो नेपाल के अन्य भाषाओँ के विकास पर भी खर्चा हो।

और संपर्क भाषा की बात है। नेपाली और हिंदी दो वैसे भाषा हैं।

और कुछ भाषा हैं जो शिक्षा, वाणिज्य के महत्व के हैं। जैसे कि अंग्रेजी। लेकिन धीरे धीरे चीनी भाषा भी वहाँ पर या तो पहुँच रही है या फिर पहुँच गयी है। हाई स्कुल के बाद लोग कौन भाषा सीखेंगे वो तो मार्केट निर्णय करेगी। कुछ लोग जर्मन भाषा सीखेंगे, उनकी मर्जी।

हिंदी का लेकिन विशिष्ट स्थान है। मगर भाषा जैसा ही नहीं उससे भी ज्यादा जटिल। मधेसी पहचान के केंद्रविंदु रहे हिंदी भाषा को अभी तक मान्यता नहीं मिलना बहुत गलत बात है। उसके अलावे संपर्क भाषा। सिर्फ मधेस में ही नहीं पहाड़ में भी। दक्षिण एशिया स्तर पर भी। नेपाल से लोग बहुत जाते हैं भारत काम करने, पढाई लिखाई करने। गूगल सारे इंटरनेट को हिंदी में अनुवाद करने की बात कर रही है। भारत और आर्थिक प्रगति करेगा तो जो नेपाली अमेरिका बेलायत जाते हैं वो भी भारत जाना शुरू कर देंगे १० साल में। हिंदी को संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ का छठा भाषा बनवाना नेपाल के अंतर्राष्ट्रीय मर्यादा से सम्बंधित है।

हिंदी भाषा नेपाल में स्थानीय से क्षेत्रीय से राष्ट्रिय से अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय स्तर तक मायने रखती है। नेपाल विकसित देश बनना है तो हिंदी भाषा अपरिहार्य है।

तो क्या वजह है की हिंदी भाषा के प्रति अभी तक नेपाल के भितर पुर्ण राजनीतिक घृणा के दृष्टि से देखा गया है? Self Hate. आत्म घृणा। नेपाल में हिंदी को घृणा करने वाले खस वही हैं जो शत प्रतिशत सब के सब भारत से आए लोग हैं। ब्रिटिश साम्राज्यवाद ने जो आत्म घृणा का सबक उन्हें सिखाया उसको वो अभी तक भुल नहीं पाए हैं। शर्म की बात है।

Madhesi Self Hate, Indian Self Hate: One And The Same
Madhesi Self Hate




Saturday, September 19, 2015

पहिचान को महत्त्व, मातृभाषामा प्राथमिक शिक्षा को महत्व

Lord Macaulay, 1835:
I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation.














Minute by the Hon'ble T. B. Macaulay, dated the 2nd February 1835.
All parties seem to be agreed on one point, that the dialects commonly spoken among the natives of this part of India contain neither literary nor scientific information, and are moreover so poor and rude that, until they are enriched from some other quarter, it will not be easy to translate any valuable work into them. It seems to be admitted on all sides, that the intellectual improvement of those classes of the people who have the means of pursuing higher studies can at present be affected only by means of some language not vernacular amongst them. ......... What then shall that language be? One-half of the committee maintain that it should be the English. The other half strongly recommend the Arabic and Sanscrit. ....... I have no knowledge of either Sanscrit or Arabic. But I have done what I could to form a correct estimate of their value. I have read translations of the most celebrated Arabic and Sanscrit works. I have conversed, both here and at home, with men distinguished by their proficiency in the Eastern tongues. I am quite ready to take the oriental learning at the valuation of the orientalists themselves.

I have never found one among them who could deny that a single shelf of a good European library was worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia.

The intrinsic superiority of the Western literature is indeed fully admitted by those members of the committee who support the oriental plan of education. ........ It will hardly be disputed, I suppose, that the department of literature in which the Eastern writers stand highest is poetry. And I certainly never met with any orientalist who ventured to maintain that the Arabic and Sanscrit poetry could be compared to that of the great European nations. But when we pass from works of imagination to works in which facts are recorded and general principles investigated, the superiority of the Europeans becomes absolutely immeasurable. It is, I believe, no exaggeration to say that all the historical information which has been collected from all the books written in the Sanscrit language is less valuable than what may be found in the most paltry abridgments used at preparatory schools in England. ........

We have to educate a people who cannot at present be educated by means of their mother-tongue. We must teach them some foreign language.

...... of all foreign tongues, the English tongue is that which would be the most useful to our native subjects. .......

The question now before us is simply whether, when it is in our power to teach this language, we shall teach languages in which, by universal confession, there are no books on any subject which deserve to be compared to our own, whether, when we can teach European science, we shall teach systems which, by universal confession, wherever they differ from those of Europe differ for the worse, and whether, when we can patronize sound philosophy and true history, we shall countenance, at the public expense, medical doctrines which would disgrace an English farrier, astronomy which would move laughter in girls at an English boarding school, history abounding with kings thirty feet high and reigns thirty thousand years long, and geography made of seas of treacle and seas of butter.

........ There are, in modern times, to go no further, two memorable instances of a great impulse given to the mind of a whole society, of prejudices overthrown, of knowledge diffused, of taste purified, of arts and sciences planted in countries which had recently been ignorant and barbarous. ....... The first instance to which I refer is the great revival of letters among the Western nations

at the close of the fifteenth and the beginning of the sixteenth century. At that time almost everything that was worth reading was contained in the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans.

Had our ancestors acted as the Committee of Public Instruction has hitherto noted, had they neglected the language of Thucydides and Plato, and the language of Cicero and Tacitus, had they confined their attention to the old dialects of our own island, had they printed nothing and taught nothing at the universities but chronicles in Anglo-Saxon and romances in Norman French, --would England ever have been what she now is? What the Greek and Latin were to the contemporaries of More and Ascham, our tongue is to the people of India. The literature of England is now more valuable than that of classical antiquity. I doubt whether the Sanscrit literature be as valuable as that of our Saxon and Norman progenitors. ................ Within the last hundred and twenty years, a nation which had previously been in a state as barbarous as that in which our ancestors were before the Crusades has gradually emerged from the ignorance in which it was sunk, and has taken its place among civilized communities. I speak of Russia. ......

The languages of western Europe civilised Russia. I cannot doubt that they will do for the Hindoo what they have done for the Tartar.

...... For it is proved by unanswerable evidence, that we are not at present securing the co-operation of the natives. ....... The people of India do not require to be paid for eating rice when they are hungry, or for wearing woollen cloth in the cold season. To come nearer to the case before us: --The children who learn their letters and a little elementary arithmetic from the village schoolmaster are not paid by him. He is paid for teaching them. Why then is it necessary to pay people to learn Sanscrit and Arabic? Evidently because it is universally felt that the Sanscrit and Arabic are languages the knowledge of which does not compensate for the trouble of acquiring them. On all such subjects the state of the market is the detective test. ...... We are not content to leave the natives to the influence of their own hereditary prejudices. To the natural difficulties which obstruct the progress of sound science in the East, we add great difficulties of our own making. Bounties and premiums, such as ought not to be given even for the propagation of truth, we lavish on false texts and false philosophy. ....... What we spend on the Arabic and Sanscrit Colleges is not merely a dead loss to the cause of truth. It is bounty-money paid to raise up champions of error. It goes to form a nest not merely of helpless placehunters but of bigots prompted alike by passion and by interest to raise a cry against every useful scheme of education. If there should be any opposition among the natives to the change which I recommend, that opposition will be the effect of our own system. It will be headed by persons supported by our stipends and trained in our colleges. The longer we persevere in our present course, the more formidable will that opposition be. It will be every year reinforced by recruits whom we are paying. From the native society, left to itself, we have no difficulties to apprehend. All the murmuring will come from that oriental interest which we have, by artificial means, called into being and nursed into strength. ........ to encourage the study of a literature, admitted to be of small intrinsic value, only because that literature inculcated the most serious errors on the most important subjects, is a course hardly reconcilable with reason, with morality, or even with that very neutrality which ought, as we all agree, to be sacredly preserved. It is confined that a language is barren of useful knowledge. We are to teach it because it is fruitful of monstrous superstitions. We are to teach false history, false astronomy, false medicine, because we find them in company with a false religion. ........ We abstain, and I trust shall always abstain, from giving any public encouragement to those who are engaged in the work of converting the natives to Christianity. And while we act thus, can we reasonably or decently bribe men, out of the revenues of the State, to waste their youth in learning how they are to purify themselves after touching an ass or what texts of the Vedas they are to repeat to expiate the crime of killing a goat? ....... Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to a Hindoo as Greek to an Englishman. ...... Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable a Hindoo to read Hume and Milton....... that English is better worth knowing than Sanscrit or Arabic, that the natives are desirous to be taught English, and are not desirous to be taught Sanscrit or Arabic, that neither as the languages of law nor as the languages of religion have the Sanscrit and Arabic any peculiar claim to our encouragement, that it is possible to make natives of this country thoroughly good English scholars, and that to this end our efforts ought to be directed. ......

We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern, --a class of persons Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect.

To that class we may leave it to refine the vernacular dialects of the country, to enrich those dialects with terms of science borrowed from the Western nomenclature, and to render them by degrees fit vehicles for conveying knowledge to the great mass of the population.......

I would at once stop the printing of Arabic and Sanscrit books. I would abolish the Mudrassa and the Sanscrit College at Calcutta. Benares is the great seat of Brahminical learning; Delhi of Arabic learning. If we retain the Sanscrit College at Bonares and the Mahometan College at Delhi we do enough and much more than enough in my opinion, for the Eastern languages.

If the Benares and Delhi Colleges should be retained, I would at least recommend that no stipends shall be given to any students who may hereafter repair thither, but that the people shall be left to make their own choice between the rival systems of education without being bribed by us to learn what they have no desire to know. The funds which would thus be placed at our disposal would enable us to give larger encouragement to the Hindoo College at Calcutta, and establish in the principal cities throughout the Presidencies of Fort William and Agra schools in which the English language might be well and thoroughly taught. ......... I believe that the present system tends not to accelerate the progress of truth but to delay the natural death of expiring errors. ..... We are a Board for wasting the public money, for printing books which are of less value than the paper on which they are printed was while it was blank--

for giving artificial encouragement to absurd history, absurd metaphysics, absurd physics, absurd theology

-- for raising up a breed of scholars who find their scholarship an incumbrance and blemish, who live on the public while they are receiving their education, and whose education is so utterly useless to them that, when they have received it, they must either starve or live on the public all the rest of their lives.